Hull City vs Chelsea Result

Hull City
Full Time

Chelsea
π MKM Stadium, Hull
ποΈ Friday, 13 Feb 2026 at 19:45
π₯ AI Prediction Report
CERTIFIED WPredicted
0 - 2
Actual
0 - 4
π° Bet Results1/1 hit
Estimated ROI (Β£100/bet)
Staked: Β£100 Β· Returns: Β£120
+Β£20
+20% ROI
Chelsea Crush Hull City with Ruthless 4-0 FA Cup Display at MKM Stadium
Chelsea delivered a commanding performance at the MKM Stadium, sweeping aside Hull City 4-0 to book their spot in the next round of the FA Cup. Despite the home side's spirited start and defensive resilience, Chelsea's quality and control eventually told, with goals arriving at regular intervals either side of half-time. The visitors dominated possession with a staggering 77%, firing 8 shots on target from 13 attempts, while Hull struggled to create clear chances and managed just 2 shots on target from 9 efforts. The breakthrough came late in the first half, and Chelsea never looked back, adding three more goals after the interval to put the result beyond doubt. Hull City, set up in a 3-4-2-1 formation, found themselves overwhelmed by Chelsea's fluid attacking play and could not recover, despite making use of their width and earning 7 corners. Ultimately, the gulf in class was evident as Chelsea cruised to a comprehensive victory.
Hull City
Hull City set up defensively in a 3-4-2-1, aiming to frustrate Chelsea and hit on the break. They showed early discipline, limiting Chelsea to half-chances for much of the first half. However, their lack of possession (just 23%) and inability to retain the ball under pressure left them chasing shadows for long spells. Their attacking forays were sporadic, and despite earning 7 corners, they rarely threatened Robert SΓ‘nchez's goal. As Chelsea's pressure mounted, Hull's defensive structure began to unravel, conceding four times in a 31-minute spell. The home side's midfield struggled to gain a foothold, and their front three were isolated for much of the contest.
Key Players
Strengths
Weaknesses
Chelsea
Chelsea were in complete control from the outset, dictating tempo and territory with 77% possession. Their 4-2-3-1 formation allowed for fluid movement in attack, with the trio behind Liam Delap pulling Hull's defenders out of position. The Blues' patience paid off with a breakthrough late in the first half, and they ruthlessly capitalized on their dominance after the break, scoring three more times. Defensively, Chelsea were rarely troubled, and their midfield duo of Andrey Santos and MoisΓ©s Caicedo ensured Hull never gained a foothold. The performance was professional and clinical, underlining the visitors' cup ambitions.
Key Players
Strengths
Weaknesses
Key Moments
40' β Goal
Chelsea open the scoring, breaking Hull's resistance late in the first half.
51' β Goal
Chelsea double their lead early in the second half, taking control of the tie.
59' β Goal
Chelsea add a third, effectively sealing progression.
71' β Goal
Chelsea complete the rout with a fourth goal.
Various' β Yellow Cards
Both sides pick up two yellow cards each in a competitive but fair contest.
Tactical Analysis
Hull City's 3-4-2-1 was designed to pack the central areas and provide wing-back width, but Chelsea's 4-2-3-1 exploited the spaces between the lines. The visitors' midfield pairing shielded the defense and recycled possession efficiently, while the attacking trio behind Delap rotated positions to disorient Hull's back three. Chelsea's pressing high up the pitch forced Hull into mistakes and limited their ability to counter. Set pieces offered Hull brief respite, as evidenced by their 7 corners, but Chelsea defended these situations with composure. The away side's tactical discipline and technical superiority were decisive, as they maintained control and upped the tempo after the break to kill off the contest.
Turning Point
Chelsea's opening goal in the 40th minute broke Hull's resistance and shifted momentum irreversibly in the visitors' favor.
Man of the Match
Pedro Neto
Pulled the strings in Chelsea's attack, directly involved in key goals and consistently threatened Hull's defense.